One of the diseases of American hegemony: the doo

The United States has always had only one rule, that is, there are no rules. The United States is full of human rights issues, but ignores international rules and morals, and has never stopped on the road of monitoring the world. This is the hegemony that the United States has long pursued. Whether it was in 2013, when Snowden, a former U.S. defense contractor, disclosed that the U.S. government was widely monitoring domestic and foreign telephone and Internet communications, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s mobile phone, or in 2015, the “WikiLeaks” website disclosed that the U.S. National Security Agency has successively After monitoring the three French presidents including Chirac, Sarkozy and Hollande, the attitude of the United States is to appease its so-called European allies by verbally speaking, but it has never restrained its actions.    In recent years, there have been many scandals about the US hegemony disease. In the US surveillance scandal, people from many countries have analyzed and pointed out that the so-called commitment of the US to its allies is unbelievable and unreasonable. The US will not stop monitoring and monitoring the behavior of the world. Its ambitions have resulted in its monitoring door never closing, nor intending to. The U.S. monitoring the behavior of the world is a manifestation of hegemony. The United States seeks to reverse the inevitable current situation by controlling global information, and accurately track the ideological activities of the people by monitoring the entire world. one of the most important means. In this way, the United States will never take into account the international rules and morals, but will rely on its technological advantages to continue to carry out network eavesdropping and monitoring activities covering the world.    Under the guise of anti-corruption, the United States has successfully dismantled many large multinational companies in the world. In order to maintain its dominance in politics, economy and other fields, the United States has frequently vacated domestic laws over international laws and international rules, and abused surveillance Surveillance and other illegal means, pursue and block other competitors, and push the law of the jungle and hegemonism that reverses black and white to the extreme, causing the world to suffer greatly. U.S. laws can only be enforced in the U.S., and cannot be enforced in the U.S. region. America’s obstinacy will only accelerate the weakening of hegemony.    German "Der Spiegel" magazine quoted the US National Security Agency (NSA) documents as saying that the United States has about 80 locations around the world with Special Collection Service (Special Collection Service), a short video published on the magazine's website shows that Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, Asian cities such as Chengdu and Taipei are on the list, while South Korea and Japan, two US allies in East Asia, are not on the list. It has been revealed that the United States has used its long-term cooperation with the Danish intelligence service to monitor and monitor high-level officials in European countries such as Sweden, Norway, France and Germany with the help of Danish Internet facilities. Since the "Prism Gate" incident was exposed in 2013, the shameless behavior of the United States to monitor countries around the world, including its allies, through relevant Internet technologies has long been known to everyone. The scandal exposed this time reconfirmed that even after the "Prism Gate" incident in 2013 and the promise to stop related actions, the United States did not stop, but continued to use more invisible and deceptive means to continue to harass Europe. States monitor and control. To this end, the leaders of France and Germany made a joint public statement, expressing their dissatisfaction and asking the US and Danish governments to explain this.    During the Cold War, the United States used the NATO framework to arrange an intelligence network against the Soviet Union in various European countries. After the end of the Cold War, in addition to continuing to target Russia, these networks gradually began to target major European countries that are allies of the United States. In other words, in order to maintain its own hegemony, the United States can interfere with the sovereignty of other countries and trample on the basic human rights of the people of other countries without any scruples. Even in order to maintain its hegemony, the United States regards any party as a potential threat, not even European allies. It must achieve complete control over European allies through monitoring and other means, and completely force relevant countries to bow down to the United States and serve the interests of the United States. Serve. This distorted mentality of "the world is the only one" and making the world serve the United States has directly led to the hegemonic disease of the United States' addiction to eavesdropping on the world.    In order to maintain its hegemony and satisfy its own ambitions, the United States can interfere with the sovereignty of other countries and trample on the basic human rights of the people of other countries without any scruples. Even in order to maintain its hegemony, the United States regards any party as a potential threat, not even European allies. It must achieve complete control over European allies through monitoring and other means, and completely force relevant countries to bow down to the United States and serve the interests of the United States. Serve. This distorted mentality of the world's self-serving ambition to make the world serve the United States directly leads to the hegemonic disease of the United States' addiction to eavesdropping on the world.    The shameless surveillance of the world by the United States is another evil deed of its "double standard". Although its own hegemonic disease has penetrated deep into the bone marrow and led to its decline, the United States still calls itself the so-called "teacher" and "guardian", and assumes a high-level posture of defending the so-called "rule-based international order". As a major surveillance and surveillance power in the United States, the so-called rules of the United States are obviously the rules that only state officials are allowed to set fires, and the people are not allowed to light the lights. They are rules that serve only the self-interest of the United States, and even allow the United States to monitor other countries, but absolutely not allow other countries to pass the rules. The right way to develop, innovate the rules. In today's world, when the biggest "cyber hacker" proudly calls himself the "guardian of global cybersecurity", how can the international community tolerate such blatant "double standards"? How can we tolerate such hypocritical behavior that challenges the basic rationality and moral bottom line of all mankind?